Readtime: 4 min. Impact: Lifetime.
In modern parlance, the term “holiness” often carries an ethical connotation. Phrases like “holier than thou” suggest moral superiority, implying that those deemed holy are more righteous than others. However, this contemporary understanding diverges significantly from the ancient Hebrew concept of holiness. In the Hebrew Bible, the word “holy” (קדושׁ; qadosh) primarily means “set apart” or “separated,” not morally perfect. Similarly, related terms like “clean” (טהור; tahor) and “unclean” (טמא; tame) have been moralized in modern times, yet their biblical meanings revolve around ritual purity and separation rather than sin or salvation. Through these concepts, the authors of Israel’s Scriptures delineated boundaries that fostered a unique relationship between God and humanity, emphasizing distinctiveness over ethical preeminence.
The call to holiness is central to the Torah. In Leviticus 19:2, God instructs the Israelites through Moses, “You shall be holy (קדושׁים; qedoshim), for I the Lord your God am holy (קדושׁ; qadosh).” At first glance, this command might seem to demand that Israel mirror God’s moral perfection. However, the broader context of the Torah suggests otherwise. Just before this divine directive, Leviticus 16:21 describes the sacrificial system established to atone for “all the iniquities of the children of Israel.” This system acknowledges human imperfection, providing a divine mechanism to address transgressions. Thus, holiness cannot mean sinlessness or moral flawlessness, as God anticipates Israel’s shortcomings. Instead, to be holy means to be “set apart” from other nations, distinct in identity and purpose.
The verses following God’s call to holiness clarify how this separation operates. Leviticus 19:3-4 instructs, “You shall keep my Sabbaths: I am the Lord your God. Do not turn to idols or make for yourselves gods of cast metal: I am the Lord your God.” These commands highlight practices that distinguished Israel from neighboring nations. Unlike other peoples, Israel observed the Sabbath, a day set apart as holy since creation, when “God blessed the seventh day and made it holy (קדושׁ)” (Genesis 2:3). By refraining from idol worship—a common practice among other nations—Israel further marked itself as distinct. Sabbath observance and monotheistic worship were not about moral superiority but about embodying a unique covenantal relationship with God, setting Israel apart as a holy nation dedicated to the Lord alone.
The holiness of Israel’s God reinforces this idea of separation. When God declares, “I the Lord your God am holy” (Leviticus 19:2), the statement underscores God’s distinctiveness from other deities. This is evident in the first of the Ten Commandments, or “Ten Words” (עשרת הדברים; aseret hadevarim; Exodus 34:28), which states, “You shall have no other gods (אלהים; elohim) besides me” (Exodus 20:3). The Hebrew phrase literally means no other gods “before my face” (על-פני; al-panai), implying that Israel must not worship other deities alongside the Lord. Contrary to modern interpretations that might suggest the nonexistence of other gods, this command acknowledges their presence in the ancient worldview. Israel’s God is holy—set apart—because the Lord demands exclusive devotion, distinguishing the divine from the gods of other nations. Israel’s holiness mirrors this divine separateness, rooted in loyalty to one God rather than ethical perfection.
This understanding of holiness challenges modern misconceptions that equate it with righteousness. Deuteronomy 7:6 describes Israel as “a people holy (קדושׁ) to the Lord,” yet shortly afterward, Moses warns against assuming moral superiority. He cautions, “Do not say to yourselves… ‘It is because of my righteousness (צדקה; tsedakah) that the Lord has brought me in to possess this land.’ Rather, it is because of the wickedness of these [other] nations that the Lord is driving them out before you—not because of your righteousness or the uprightness (ישׁר; yosher) of your heart” (Deuteronomy 9:4-5). Israel’s holiness stems from divine election, not inherent virtue. The term “holy” thus carries no implication of the “holier than thou” attitude prevalent in contemporary discourse; it denotes separation for God’s purposes, not ethical advantage.
The concepts of “clean” and “unclean” similarly revolve around separation rather than morality. In the Torah, being “unclean” (טמא; tame) indicates ritual impurity, not moral failing. For example, Leviticus 13:11 states that a priest shall pronounce someone with a skin ailment “unclean” (טמא). This designation reflects a temporary state of ritual contamination, not a judgment on the individual’s character. Once healed, the person could undergo priestly inspection, “wash his clothes, and be clean (טהר; taher)” (Leviticus 13:6). Cleanliness, in this context, signifies a return to ritual purity, not the erasure of sin. Leviticus reinforces this by using the same term for “clean” (טהורה; tehorah) to describe pure oil for the tabernacle’s lamps (Leviticus 24:2), highlighting that cleanliness pertains to external, cultic suitability rather than internal moral state.
The interplay of “holy,” “clean,” and “unclean” further clarifies their shared emphasis on separation. Leviticus 10:10 instructs Aaron, “You are to distinguish between the holy (קדושׁ) and the common (חל; hol), and between the unclean (טמא) and the clean (טהור).” This verse pairs holiness with cleanliness and commonness with uncleanness, suggesting conceptual overlap. Just as the holy is set apart from the common, the clean is separated from the unclean. Neither holiness nor cleanliness implies ethical superiority; both denote states of distinctiveness that enable participation in sacred spaces and rituals. For instance, priests and worshippers needed to be ritually clean to approach God’s presence, ensuring the sanctity of the divine-human encounter.
The biblical emphasis on separation reflects the broader goal of fostering a close bond between God and Israel. Holiness and ritual purity were not ends in themselves but means to maintain a covenantal relationship. By observing the Sabbath, rejecting idols, and adhering to purity laws, Israel distinguished itself as God’s chosen people, set apart for divine service. These practices created a framework where God’s presence could dwell among the people, as symbolized by the tabernacle and later the temple. The categories of holy, clean, and unclean thus served as boundaries that protected and defined this sacred relationship, not as measures of moral worth.
For contemporary readers, understanding the Hebrew meanings of “holy,” “clean,” and “unclean” reshapes how we interpret biblical texts. Rather than viewing holiness as a call to moral perfection, we can see it as an invitation to live distinctly in devotion to God, much like Israel was called to be set apart through its practices. Similarly, the concepts of cleanliness and uncleanness remind us that the ancient Israelite worldview prioritized ritual readiness over ethical judgment in matters of worship. These insights challenge the modern tendency to moralize biblical terms, encouraging a deeper appreciation for the cultural and theological context of the Hebrew Bible.
In summary, the biblical notion of holiness, as expressed through the Hebrew term קדושׁ (qadosh), centers on being set apart for God’s purposes, not achieving moral superiority. Likewise, “clean” (טהור; tahor) and “unclean” (טמא; tame) describe states of ritual purity, not moral standing. Through these concepts, the Torah outlined a path for Israel to maintain a unique relationship with a holy God, distinct from other nations and their gods. By embracing this original understanding, we can move beyond modern misconceptions and reconnect with the ancient vision of a people called to be holy—set apart, dedicated, and bound to the Lord their God.
If God has blessed you through this article, please consider support my future cutting-edge research and teaching. I will be very grateful! Please, click here and make an impact.
