Take Your Son, The One You Love
Reading time: 7 min. Impact: Eternity.
Before Genesis 22, Abraham had already been tested nine times. Various versions of Jewish tradition include ten events in Abram/Abraham’s time when his faith in YHVH was significantly tested, but none rivaled the last, tenth test. The Binding of Isaac describes God’s command to Abraham to take his only son, whom he loved, and offer him as a burnt offering on a mountain that God would show him (Gen 22:1-19).
We read:
“Take your son, your favored one, the one whom you love, Isaac” (Gen 22:2).
The Hebrew piles phrase upon phrase with escalating intensity: בִּנְךָ (bin’kha, “your son”), יְחִידְךָ (y’chid’kha, “your only/unique one”), אֲשֶׁר אָהַבְתָּ (asher ahav’ta, “whom you love”), and יִצְחָק (Yitzchak, “Isaac”). By the time the sentence reaches the name, the reader is breathless. This moment is no abstraction. This is the child of laughter, the miracle son, the entire future of God’s covenant—now ordered to become a burnt offering.
The Refrain of Readiness
Three times in this story, Abraham responds with the same word: הִנֵּנִי (hineini). English cannot capture its density—”Here I am” flattens what the Hebrew conveys: complete presence, body, mind, and will, fully oriented toward the one who calls. It is the response of a servant who has already decided to obey before knowing the command.
Though we usually can’t see this in translation, in Hebrew Abraham uses this phrase three times in this one text. He says it to God in verse 1. He says it to Isaac in verse 7 (where translations render it weakly as “Yes”). He says it to the angel in verse 11. Between these three “hineini” statements, a universe of faith unfolds.
The Silent Journey
The narrator refuses to tell us what Abraham felt. We see only actions: rising early, saddling the donkey, splitting wood, and traveling three days. Three days of knowing what awaits. Three days of walking beside the son he intends to kill. Three days of silence.
When Abraham finally speaks to his servants, he says something astonishing: “We will worship and return to you” (Gen 22:5). Not “I will return.” We will return. Hebrew scholars note that this statement is either deception, self-deception, or prophecy. Abraham may be concealing the truth from his servants (lest they intervene), from Isaac (lest he flee), or from himself (lest his resolve shatter). But the text offers a more profound possibility: Abraham genuinely believes that God will raise Isaac from the dead. Hebrews 11:19 makes this point explicit: “He considered that God is able to raise people even from the dead.”
The Knife That Fell
At the moment Abraham’s hand lifted the knife, the angel cried out, “Do not lay your hand on the boy!” (Gen 22:12). Then the theological bombshell: “Now I know that you fear God, because you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”
Now God knows? Did He not know before?
God knew Abraham would obey. But Abraham needed to know. And the world needed to know. The עֲקֵדָה (Akedah, “binding”) became the proof that a human being could love God more than life itself—more than the promised future, more than the miracle child, more than all the hopes and dreams.
Isaac, Ram and Jesus
Abraham looks up and sees a ram caught by its horns. The substitution is not a rejection of sacrifice but its redirection. A midrash (a Jewish interpretive story) has Abraham pray, “May it be regarded as if the blood of this ram were the blood of my son Isaac.” The ram dies in Isaac’s place, but Isaac has already died in Abraham’s heart. That is why the angel speaks of the son as not withheld—the offering was complete before the knife struck.
Marc Chagall’s 1966 painting The Sacrifice of Isaac captures what words cannot fully express (Chagall is a Russian Jewish, later French, artist). In Chagall’s vision, the cross is already present at Moriah, hovering as he pictured it somewhere above. As Abraham raises the knife, blood streams down from the cross and the man carrying it to the altar where Isaac is bound. The crimson river pours directly onto the altar where Isaac lies bound. The ram is there too, but the blood tells the truer story: the altar, where Isaac was bound, and the cross above are intricately connected.
A Jewish pharisee, who had met a risen Christ Jesus, whom today we call Apostle Paul, once asked a rhetorical question on behalf of struggling congregations or persecuted early Christ followers in Rome.
He who did not spare His own Son but delivered Him over for us all—how will He not also, with Him, graciously give us all things? (Rom 8:32)
Both Apostle Paul and Marc Chagall understood that just as Abraham was supposed to show God, himself, and others his love for the LORD, so did the LORD have to show his love by offering his only and unique son, Jesus! (John 3:16)
Conclusion
Here is the truth the mountain teaches: God asked Abraham to show his utter and total commitment to Him, and then the LORD showed that He was willing to do exactly the same. Not only could God trust Abraham, but Abraham, as represented by all of his children, can do the same! God did not stop Himself from giving up His beloved Son, Jesus. This is the God that I can trust. And so can you.
Comments (24)
Love the way you put it! Really insightful Dr.Eli. It amazed me, it was the tenth test of Abraham’s faith. Great job as usual, God bless.
Ps. I don’t know why somy people write Avraham and not Abraham.
Avraham is Hebraic pronouncement.
Abraham was really Committed to serve God with all his being and all his belongings. I pray God gives me that kind of yeilding to
Him. Thanks Dr Eli for the teaching.
May the Lord bless you and keep you!
Thanks Dr. Eli for this beautiful piece. The path that says the sacrifice by Abraham was not a rejection but a redirection strikes me particularly and wells up a new thought in me in relation to the Sacrifice of Jesus and the relationships between the roles of Abraham and Joseph in the history of our salvation. Thank you for this wonderful job. It is well appreciated. God bless you!
Dear Fr. Michael, thank you so much. This means a lot.
Thank you. So often, teachers focus on Abraham's failings, but God knew the intent of his heart. To hide behind any of his personal weaknesses rather than his "Here I am" attitude is, in my mind, a huge mistake many believers make. God knew and recorded his "Now I know that you love me" moment.
Dr. ELI, why has your last name changed from Eysenberg?
Its a long story, but basicaly I came back to my original name at birth.
that's right.
Good stuff! However you might have mentioned that Isaac carried the wood on his back as Jesus carried the crossbram and that I AM is the name God introduced Himself to Moses as. And doesnt the number 3 , as in 3 days walk, generally picture the resurrection?
Agree, Peter, there is more to the story. But many people know these things; I try to focus on what is not widely known.
Abraham is my favourite patriarch from the Tanakh.
It's hard to bit him :-)
More than. Oh that we could live the life of ‘more than’ and embrace it with every fiber of our being.
Jesus did.
Holes in his hands, nails in his feet. ‘More than’ cried out ‘it is finished.’
Of all the words in this beautiful price of work, ‘more than’ says it all. To me, if not to all.
Thank you Dr Eli.
God bless you, Jeanet!
We need to remember that Yeshua, Jesus was The Word at the very beginning. Our Father didn’t just sacrifice His son, it was himself as The word that walked in the garden. He put himself in our place for our inquiries and because of his LOVE that God IS. Yeshua gave of His I am Statements which also parallel with the temple as given to Moses. The binding of Isaac. Was to give us a sense of the pain in sacrificing a son as well as Abraham’s astounding faith. Noting also he presented him a Ram not a Lamb. In line with both Adam, Yeshua’s and Isaac’s age. Well, this is what God has shown me. Thank you, Dr Eli for your Hebrew Jewish take on this. It’s always eye opening. God Bless You
Haley, thank you, my dear. I am not sure I agree with you about God giving himself and not his son (perhaps I missunderstood). Historical Christian understanding is clear. Father and Son are equal in power and glory, but they are most not the same person. God-the Father is Godthe Father. God the Son is God the Son.
Wonderful exposition; the Chagall painting was the perfect example of your point. It seems to me that the proper understanding of הִנֵּנִי (hineini) provides a 'key'. You explain the linguistic interpretation of the phrase in historical context - something not obvious in the English reading. Abraham had a servant's attitude; the same is required of us. As John the Baptist said in John 3:30 - "He must increase, but I must decrease." Sometimes I find myself saying it a bit differently in humility, "I must decrease that He may increase' - a challenge of faith. :^)
I look forward to that ... and I pray for the peace of Jerusalem! All of this present strife derives from ancient spiritual conflicts which must be resolved spiritually by way of human repentance and surrender - a considerable hurdle. 🙏 ...on Earth as it is in heaven.
Amen
Yes, I am currently researching Gen 24. Rebekkah's getting a test from Eliezer. Same point.
At every point where human beings act as human beings and are called to have faith in the Father it is Christ Jesus who takes our place.
Thank you for sharing.