By Dr. Eli Lizorkin-Eyzenberg.
Thank you to my friends and family for your support and prayers!
The Book of Revelation, a vivid and complex apocalyptic text, introduces the enigmatic figure of the Beast, portrayed as the ultimate adversary of God’s people. In Revelation 13:16-18, the text describes a dire scenario where followers of Christ are excluded from participating in the local economy unless they accept the “mark of the Beast” on their right hand or forehead. This mark, associated with the mysterious number 666, has sparked intense speculation across centuries, with interpretations ranging from literal tattoos to modern technological implants. However, to grasp the true significance of the mark of the Beast, we must anchor our understanding in the Jewish literary and cultural context of the Second Temple period (516 BCE–70 CE), during which Revelation was composed. By examining the text through this lens, it becomes evident that the mark is not a futuristic microchip or a physical brand but a symbolic expression of allegiance that stands in direct opposition to the covenantal fidelity demanded by God in Jewish tradition.
The Jewish Context of Revelation
The Book of Revelation, written toward the end of the first century CE, is a profoundly Jewish text, steeped in the imagery, theology, and literary conventions of Second Temple Judaism. Its author, traditionally identified as John, employs apocalyptic language to address communities of Christ-followers living under the shadow of Roman imperial power. Scholars widely agree that Revelation is an anti-Roman document, critiquing the political, religious, and economic systems of the empire, which demanded loyalty to Caesar and participation in idolatrous practices. The Beast, often interpreted as a symbol of Rome or its emperor, embodies the forces that oppose God’s kingdom and persecute His people.
To understand the mark of the Beast, we must first recognize the centrality of Jewish scriptural traditions in shaping Revelation’s imagery. The book draws heavily on the Hebrew Bible, particularly the Torah, the Prophets, and the Writings, reinterpreting these texts to convey its message. One of the most significant Torah passages for Jews during the Second Temple period was the Shema, found in Deuteronomy 6:4-9. Recited twice daily, the Shema begins with the declaration, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one.” This affirmation of monotheistic faith is followed by instructions to love God wholeheartedly and to keep His commandments ever-present: “You shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes” (Deut. 6:8). This commandment was taken literally by Jews, who practiced the ritual of laying tefillin—small leather boxes containing Torah verses, bound to the forearm and forehead during prayer.
The tefillin ritual was a visible and tangible expression of covenantal loyalty to God, marking the worshiper as one who belonged to the covenant community. In the Second Temple period, this practice was widespread, as evidenced by archaeological finds such as tefillin cases from Qumran and references in texts like the Letter of Aristeas. For John’s audience, familiar with this daily ritual, the imagery of a mark on the hand and forehead would immediately evoke the tefillin and its theological significance: obedience to God’s Law and rejection of idolatry.
The Mark of the Beast as a Counterfeit Sign
In light of this Jewish context, the mark of the Beast emerges as a deliberate inversion of the tefillin, a counterfeit sign that signifies allegiance to the Beast rather than to God. Just as the tefillin represent an inward and outward commitment to God’s commandments, the mark of the Beast symbolizes conformity to the idolatrous and oppressive systems of the Roman Empire. Revelation 13:16-17 states that no one can “buy or sell” without the mark, suggesting that it is a prerequisite for participation in the economic and social structures of the empire. This requirement mirrors the pressures faced by first-century Christians, who were often compelled to offer sacrifices to the emperor or participate in pagan rituals to access markets, guilds, or civic life.
The mark’s placement on the right hand and forehead reinforces its role as a parody of the tefillin. In Jewish thought, the hand symbolizes action and the forehead represents thought or intention. By binding God’s Law to these parts of the body, the tefillin signify that a person’s deeds and mind are devoted to God. Conversely, the mark of the Beast indicates that one’s actions and thoughts are aligned with the Beast’s authority, whether through active participation in imperial worship or passive acquiescence to its demands. This interpretation is supported by Revelation’s broader use of contrasting imagery, such as the sealing of God’s servants on their foreheads (Rev. 7:3; 14:1) versus the marking of the Beast’s followers. The seal of God, like the tefillin, denotes divine protection and ownership, while the mark of the Beast signifies spiritual and moral compromise.
Rejecting Modern Misinterpretations
Many contemporary interpretations of the mark of the Beast, particularly within certain Christian circles, envision it as a literal, futuristic device—such as a microchip or barcode—implanted under the skin to control economic transactions. While these theories resonate with modern anxieties about technology and surveillance, they are disconnected from the first-century Jewish context of Revelation. The idea of a subcutaneous implant would have been incomprehensible to John’s audience, who lacked the technological framework to conceive of such a device. Moreover, Revelation’s apocalyptic genre relies on symbolic rather than literal imagery, using metaphors to convey spiritual truths. For example, the “seven heads” of the Beast (Rev. 13:1) are not literal heads but represent political power, likely alluding to Rome’s seven hills or a succession of emperors.
Instead of a physical mark, the mark of the Beast should be understood as an expression of allegiance, whether inward (a mindset of compromise) or outward (participation in idolatrous practices). In the first century, this could have taken the form of offering incense to the emperor, carrying a certificate (libellus) of compliance with imperial worship, or engaging in economic systems tied to pagan rituals. Such actions marked individuals as loyal to Rome, in direct conflict with the exclusive devotion to God demanded by the Shema and the teachings of Christ. For John’s audience, refusing the mark meant enduring economic exclusion, social ostracism, and even martyrdom, as they remained faithful to their covenant with God.
Theological Implications
The contrast between the mark of the Beast and the tefillin underscores a central theme of Revelation: the cosmic conflict between God’s kingdom and the forces of evil. The Beast, as the enemy of God and His people, seeks to usurp God’s authority by claiming the loyalty that belongs solely to the Creator. By replacing the mark of God (the tefillin) with his own mark, the Beast attempts to redefine human identity and purpose, drawing people away from the covenantal relationship with God. This struggle is not merely political or economic but spiritual, as it involves the ultimate question of whom humanity will serve.
For contemporary readers, the mark of the Beast serves as a timeless warning against compromising with systems or ideologies that oppose God’s values. While the specific context of Roman imperial worship has passed, the principle remains: believers are called to embody God’s commandments in their thoughts and actions, resisting pressures to conform to unjust or idolatrous structures. The tefillin, as a symbol of covenantal fidelity, reminds us that true worship involves aligning every aspect of life—mind, body, and soul—with God’s will.
Conclusion
The mark of the Beast, when viewed through the lens of Second Temple Jewish literature and practice, is not a literal implant or tattoo but a powerful symbol of allegiance to the forces that oppose God. By evoking the imagery of the tefillin, John presents the mark as a counterfeit sign that challenges the covenantal loyalty demanded by the Shema. This interpretation, rooted in the Jewish context of Revelation, reveals the mark’s true nature as an inward or outward expression of compromise with idolatrous systems, particularly the Roman Empire. By understanding the mark in this way, we move beyond speculative fears of modern technology and embrace Revelation’s call to faithful resistance, trusting in the ultimate victory of God’s kingdom over the powers of evil.
Important from Dr. Eli: Please, consider making your occasional or ongoing contribution of any size to help me sustain and grow this Hebraic teaching ministry! Please, click HERE or below.
Excellent explanation. I’ve listened to and read some dribble over the years. Most recently Covid was going around that this was the Mark: what! You can’t get away from the fact that all scripture needs to be read and discussed in a Jewish context.
Exactly. Thanks, Phil!
Great insight and teaching.
I am reminded of the 3 Hebrew men in Daniel Chapter 3 and Daniel himself in Daniel Chapter 6.
I see a parallel also with Romans 3:1-3 cf Deut 6:4-9.
Thanks again for the Jewish context
Thank you. Good insight.
I love your teaching. Your teaching brings me closer to the Lord Jesus. God bless you.
Dear Robert, There are hardly more encouraging words that you could have written.
I want you to know that I really appreciate your writings! I feel less worried about the signs in understanding them, than what I thought it was to mean! Thank you very much!
Blessings, Pam. We must, of course, stay alert, but come to these kinds of things with both an open mind and an adequate interpretation of the Scriptures.
Excellent! The church has strayed from remembering the Jewish importance. Very insightful.
Thanks, Stacey! Let’s keep thinking together.
Thank you for this very important Jewish Background to this matter that have confounded many of the Christian faith and belief .
Please continue to enhance our understanding with these enlighteningredients updates.
Colin, I will do my best. You pray for me.
Great explanation, Dr. Eli 👏! I dealt with this topic a few weeks ago through the lens of Gematriya (Nero Caesar, 666, etc.), and your article brings fresh insight. It might inspire me for a future course on my YouTube channel — thank you ! Blessings
Thank you for your wonderful feedback, my brother!
Thank you for this very excellent explanation! I have studied Revelation for many years, but your teaching has been the most contextual. I have very much enjoyed studying scripture from the Jewish perspective—which is the way it was intended to be understood!
Christina, may we continue to seek the Lord together. Always.
Excellent work, Dr. Eli. The Geographic Description leaves little room for argument that it is Rome, and tying the imagery of the tefillin makes a lot of sense. The Shema is the greatest commandment for both Jews and Christians. Thank you for the article, and yes, please do a video or lecture on it! I would love to watch the video or attend the lecture.
Thank you, David!
Thank you, Dr. Eli! Great! Just like the video you shared that elucidated Revelation 12:1-2, which showed the symbolism in the book may very well have been the more realistic, concrete constellation of Virgo, the Virgin, with the sun in Virgo and the moon at the feet of the constellation, to indicate place and time in human history of Christ’s birth. So, I can imagine the “mark” of the beast in Revelation 13 having a similar realistic, concrete explanation that is not to scare nor cause anxiety, but to inform, strengthen, prepare, even encourage those who love the Lord.
Mark of the beast is for scarier and prevalent in our society than we allow ourselves to imagine.
Thank you Dr Eli. This is a powerful explanation of Revelation that touched me and probably others. It is good to remind people to stand fast in their lives to the G-d of Israel
Amen!
Thanks for all those information
I have long story from bible reading.
Lately i am visiting Pillar of fire.
Blessings and peace!
This is a fitting description – “a powerful symbol of allegiance”. We can only speculate. Only time will reveal the true form, substance and function. Satisfying explanation.
Thank you, Ramon.
Thank you, once again, Dr. Eli, for bringing such crucial information.
For years, all I have heard from ministers is how we will be left behind when the tribulation takes place and will be marked with the mark of the beast (666). Though, I have known for years this is not a fact. But it helps to hear this from a well-educated man of God, who also happens to be Jewish.
The truth needs to be told to debunk all the false ideologies and theologies out there.
Thank you, Abigail! This understandings ironically makes this far more relevant to us today.
I agree with your interpretation. I have thought for a long time that it’s not outward signs but inward behaviour God looks like. God said to Samuel that He looks to the heart not just mere appearances. We need spiritual transformation and sanctification of the mind to bring about sanctified behaviour. Its about walking in holy behavior inwardly and outwardly. Setting ourselves aside for God and His purposes. In Jesus time , He did only that. He showed us how to live in corrupt society and remain obedient to God.
Amen
Thank you Dr Eli for this insightful teaching. The Shema is a beautiful reminder of G-d’s souvereignity. So much has been lost in translation and as people are frantically search for answers, relying on others to explain G-d’s Word, they can only find it in Scripture and read it for themselves. People perish because of lack of knowledge.
So glad you enjoyed it, Sylvia!
Oh, thank you and so true that “the mark” is “far scarier and prevalent in our society,” infinitely far above and beyond what “we allow ourselves to imagine,” and absolute fearsome for those whom the Lord does not know and did not save via Gospel truths and the power of the Holy Spirit. Thank you. I had 578 words. I couldn’t fit my whole response and I ended up just attaching the first 100 words. I appreciate this word limitation, all your responses, and this opportunity to interact with you and hear from others. ברוך השם ושלום
Blessings!
The good fear of The Lord makes me want to be more faithful to Him above, all by His grace! So grateful He above is Faithful and True, and that He is with us to the end!
Would you be willing and able to talk about
G-d the Father, G-d the Son (The Son of G-d and ALSO Son of Man), G-d the Holy Spirit — ONE G-d in unity from the Jewish perspective in the OT? “Elohim.” Genesis 1. Psalm 22. Isaiah 53. Other areas in Isaiah. Ezekiel. And so many other references!
A very interesting take on the mark of the beast. The book of revelations is full of symbolism and vivid language that I have taken to heart🩷 literally and figuratively for years.
A different perspective is always refreshing.
Thank you Dr.Eli 🙏👍🙏
Blessings, Donita!
“”Would you be willing and able to talk about G-d the Father, G-d the Son (The Son of G-d and ALSO Son of Man), G-d the Holy Spirit — ONE G-d in unity from the Jewish perspective in the OT?”” – An Excellent challenge! We all know that the Lord our G-d is One; we believers in Christ also believe that he represented haShem on Earth AND will sit on the Bema Seat in eternity. It is a mystery, not critical to faith, but repeatedly addressed for two millennia.
God bless you, sir, for the effort and time put into this article. It is truly insightful. As I read through, two questions came to my mind: from this explanation you’ve given, what then would you say about the One Thousand year reign found in Revelation 20? Is it literal or also symbolic, which of its interpretations (post-millenial, etc.) is most likely?
Secondly, what is the place of allegorical interpretation in reading Revelations, and by extension, other Scriptures?
Thanks for your time, sir!
Ifu, I will be writing about that. Thank you for bringing this up! There is no way to answer this quickly 🙁
OK sir, I’ll be anticipating that. More grace to you, sir.
Amen!
Dr. Eli, I agree with your take on the mark of the beast. As someone with spiritually inspired tattoos, I believe it’s about where your heart truly aligns. Our bodies are temples, but what we do with them is between us and God. I expect to see tech like blockchain-connected chips, but that doesn’t automatically mean allegiance to evil. Rather than rely on religion or fear, we should seek God directly for wisdom and discernment. I appreciate your insight and work.
—Caleb
Thanks, Caleb.
Dr. Eli, thank you greatly for your eye opening message about the mark of the beast! You’re the first person I’ve ever heard explain the mark of the beast the way you did. A the first to make sense to me, about what the mark is.
Thank you greatly for your eye opening lesson.
Sincerely, Shirley
Shirley, hi. Isn’t sad? 🙁
It’s most unfortunate that this writer didn’t see the book of Revelation as “revelation” indeed. It was never written for 1st century christians but it’s a description of events that would happen later as clearly indicated by Revelation chapter 1 itself. Apostle John was simply asked to write what would be revealed to him. He didn’t write a fiction rather, he wrote down what the Lord, through angel, revealed to him.
🙂
If it’s not literal, how then will one be excluded farom participating in the economy.
Easily. For example, someone who does not support the government-approved line of thought does not get or keep a job and gets their business closed. This was already in some limited way done in the USA under previous administrations. This is just one way this could be manifested.
Excellent article! I would like to add the mark of the beast is on the right hand whereas the tefillin is on the left. Let us be careful not to carry both marks and therefore be double-minded.
Yes, correct. I have understood this as a parody.
Dr. Eli. Thank you so much for explaining this book from First Christian perspective. Many people today don’t have a proper understanding of the times in which the Books were written.Thank you for explaining more clearly , the intention that the New Testament Books were written..
Yes, thank you Beth. It is always important to read Biblical books in their original historical and cultural settings.
Thank you for this enlightening article.
God bless you!
That clarified a lot. And it makes sense.
Thank you, Bob!
I have studied the book of revelation for 30 years and I have never seen it explained this way before thank you doctor Eli. It makes total sense now.
Brian, you are very kind!
Thank you for your analysis. Compliance and choice however go much farther than symbolism. The COVID Vaccines were an example of bribery, coercion and threats being used to get people to ‘agree’ to something that they normally wouldn’t. However is you are unaware that self-assembling microchips are ALREADY in 2/3rds of the population you might want to verify this documentation below. Your comment limit prohibited me from posting it all here. A wallet in your body has been patented and implemented by Microsoft, Google and Moderna.
https://x.com/PolitiJim/status/1948753188863312220?t=44impnx2Ej_IwD5yNSPbMQ&s=19
I am not with you on this, Jim. I did approve the comment so that others can make up their own mind. Blessings and much peace!
While your emphasis on the spiritual significance of the mark is correct, you do not consider the means of implementation. The world currency systems are moving to online digital currencies. During the COVID trauma, Bill Gates applied for a patent, which included the number 666, for tying technological inserts by means of ‘vaccinations’ to this currency, in order to control buying and selling. If the agents and forces of darkness are researching the implementation of such a system, why do you reject the possibility that the Anti-Messiah would seek to harness technology in order to assert his control?
I always say that if Men in Black show up at your door and say, Give me your hand; we will implant something under your skin,. Don’t be stupid. Don’t do it! But I think it is a mistake to think of it purely in technological or biotech terms. I can be wrong, but this is what I think.
Thank you for this wise teaching and I agree with your interpretation Dr. Eli. Keep on with your powerful teachings. May God Almighty richly bless you with more and more divine wisdom.
Thank you once again.
Kelvin, please, pray for me to be able to teach faithfully.
The book of Revelation is very Jewish indeed; so much so that believers in Jesus Christ, both Gentile and Jew, should not be concerned with the events in tribulation (mark of the beast, etc), simply because Torah and the Prophets clearly state end-time and the last days will deal with the Jewish people, and specifically, the beautiful nation, Israel – we, as believers, will not be here. We have His promise and His peace. Shalom!
Thank you, Josiah for your comment.
Greetings in the name of the Lord. What you say here makes a lot of sense. Why do you think John used the Greek “stigma” for “mark”, rather than some other word? I know finding motive in 2000 year old writing is not always easy, clear or correct when translated into English, or even into Greek. Thoughts?
In Him,
D
John’s use of stigma (στίγμα) in Revelation 13:16-17 for the “mark” of the beast likely reflects its Greco-Roman context, where stigma meant a tattoo or brand denoting slavery or allegiance. Unlike sphragis (God’s seal), stigma carries a degrading connotation, contrasting divine protection with the beast’s coercive control. Its vivid imagery suits the apocalyptic vision, emphasizing a visible, permanent pledge to the beast. While motives are hard to pinpoint, stigma’s cultural resonance and theological contrast make it apt. Manuscript variations (charagma vs. stigma) add complexity, but stigma underscores the mark’s shameful significance.
Wow! Thank you Dr. Eli. I almost missed the information I have always needed. Before I read this, I thought I would not understand. I now have a very clear understanding of the meaning of this chapter. Thank you again Sir. God bless you.
God bless you!
I couldn’t help but thinking as I read this, that firstly futuristic references (i.e. the chips) though not correctly understood, seem to be common in prophetic literature. Secondly, if the first century context was exclusively intended, then wouldn’t there be drawings and or early writings speaking of exactly that, special marks on the hand or forehead that had to be worn by first century adherents? I am not personally aware of anything like that.
The mark of the beast does not need to be literally worn.
Only the kellipah the shell aspect of the Greek “Therion” beast is the counterfeit mark. The TRUE THERION is the zodiacal “beast” of the Platonic age. This animal for early Christians would be a fish/leviathan for Pisces. The phrase “calculate the number” from, that infamous verse in Revelation 13:18, n Greek gematria = 2368 which equals Iosuas Christos. They hid the real Leviathan who brings the great love in behind the kellipah of empire. The number 666 is the value of the square Kamea of the sun and a sacred chotem seal in Solomonic tradition.
Sorry I did not follow. Michael can you rewrite it simpler plz?
The verse in Revelation has a dual meaning. The outer quality is called in Hebrew a Kellipah. It is the shell or shadow of a quality. The word for beast is THERION in Greek. It refers to the beast of the zodiac like Jesus=fish of the new age of Pisces. An initiate may carry this root planetary soul called sometimes the demiurges in the Gnosis. Read the book The City of revelation by John Michell.The authors of Revelation hid the fact they were talking about their Lord.
Michael, I don’t follow, but perhaps someone else will. Blessings!
I am impressed and actually received clarity of interpretation, but my problem here is: isn’t the Roman rulers and political structure not a symbol and representation of Satan and his kingdom, the mark is clearly understood proportionately to the tefilin , so from a spiritual standpoint the common denominator here is pointing to the satanic involvement in the human race if God’s kingdom: thank you for making this apocalyptic context plain, you are appreciated,
Dear Francis, I hope it is clearer now. Remember, apocalypse means unveiling, making something hidden visible. If Revelation seems super complicated, it is because we are reading it in the wrong way.
Why are you so obsessed with “the Jewish context of revelation” if the book of revelation was written for Christians under the roman empire?
Also, we have two major problems if the book of revelation has already been fulfilled:
A) Where is the New Jerusalem?
B) Where is the finished judgment upon Babylon the great, mystery, mother of all harlots?
–
now, the jewish context of revelation will be very clear to ISRAELIS once the anti-christ rears his ugly head…
Hi, Luca :-). Am I obsessed with the Jewish background of the Book of Revelation? Not really. But I am obsessed with not reading into the Scripture something that does not belong there. THE ONLY way I know how to avoid it is to get the context right. In the case of the Book of Revelation Jewish context is very significant, but so is Greco-Roman context. Perhaps you jumped the gun :-). Also at no point did I say that all things in Revelation were already fulfilled.
Dear Dr. Eli;
Thank you, from my heart, for these enlightening and inspiring words regarding “The Mark of the Beast.” You have given me much food for thought; I was one of those who perceived the mark as a technological implant. I remember years ago seeing a young woman check out at the register by waving her hand across a scanner and my first thought was: “Does she realize she has taken the Mark of the Beast?” Knowledge is power. God Bless You and Your Family;
Dear Deborah, one of the greatest strengths is the ability to say, I was wrong. Not a lot of people can do it. Taking my hat off before you!
Learning more about this topic by going outside my comfort zone. Very insightful position and reallys me help re-examine my position. You are the second author who has debunked the physical mark of the beast.
Thank you for sharing
I do not deny that the mark of the beast cannot be physical. It can. I think we need to be on the lookoutfor its non-physical but extremely dangerous manifestations.
So if /when the government orders everyone to take some sort of permanent ID mark in/on the body, believers should or should nt have it?
While I agree with what you say above I do also believe that the prophetic imagery in books like Revelation, Daniel and Ezequiel are not limited in time so as to not include modern inventions such as vaccines/rfid chips etc. The white horse and its rider goes forth with a toxon/ bow…..of course most people did nt know the original word toxon.
The author and receipents have to understand each other.
I resonate with this explanation fron exegetical perspective of studying the book of Revelation for all its worth.
Let’s keep on it!
Excellent, thank you. I’m not able to contribute financially, but I have four of your books.
Shalom
Pam, thank you! We all do out best! May the Lord bless you!
Thank you.! ….
Here i am 40 years old now understanding this text that has intrigued me since i began reading the scriptures at 8 years old.
Awesome!!
Keep it up!
The MARK of the BEAST is nothing else but “REBELLION AGAINST THE LAW” It is in your forehead [MIND]
Yes, God’s law/word.
You have provided much insight about the Mark of the Beast. My church’s teaching about the subject is similar to yours. The Jewish context you shared makes it much clearer and rich for me. (I glean gem from all your writings.)
May the Lord bless you! Thank you, Naomi!
God is clear when He speaks in allegory or parable. If the birthpains are here and global floods are a sign the birthwater has broken(!), then time is short…Earth’s “rotation on its axis has been speeding up, leading to slightly shorter days.” God says mountains are governments, seas are peoples; never the mark to buy and sell is allegory. “Every eye shall see” live-as-it-happens news. Teachers say we are the only third temple; that antichrist seeks to enter us declaring he is God. I think when God speaks plainly, we need ears to hear what the Spirit sayeth.
Yes, in Revelation we see many allegories. The mistake is to think if something is an allegory, it is not true.
Hi Dr. Eli,
This is the best eplanation I´ve ever heard (read).
I think that you are right. Everyone else is just telling fables.
I admire your writings for some years.
Thank you very much.
May God bless you.
Dear Edwin, may God guard you and me from telling fables!
That’s powerful for those who do not understand the truth
We all need God’s power unto salvation, wherever we are already believers or not yet.
Thankyou so much for acknowledged
Shalom and blessings!
Thank you Dr Eli! I have have had my suspicion concerning the mark and my thoughts were usually drawn to the scriptures that you mentioned. It’s simply amazing how easily people can be deceived especially by the rulers of evil intentions! Again, thank you for your explanation as it applies to this time in history.
Blessings, Terry! Let us stay alert now, not only in the future.
“Thank you for this satisfactory teaching.”
When I went to school satisfactory was not satisfactory with my mother :-).
Thank you so much for your insight into the mark. I’ve never heard it explained so clearly, it’s obvious when I think about it. Unfortunately in the churches in the UK I find that seeing things from a Jewish perspective is very rare.
Wendy, this may be so, but also keep in mind. There is no single Jewish perspective; there are only various Jewish perspectives. The perspective you are reading about it is mine :-).
I got the email to your blog, glad I did. I have said the very same thing for years. studied the Bible for many years. This explanation is so easy to see. Many are hung up on deep meanings. This is a simple, common-sense interpretation. Though I do enjoy learning Jewish thoughts on scripture. Seeing the Bible through the eyes of those that God used to write it the only way to go. I am excited to look more into your work. Thank you, Doug
Thanks, Doug! They say great minds think alike 🙂
Thank you for such a very informative article Dr. Eli!
You are very welcome, James!
Is the Mark of the Beast identical to the Mark of the Beast’s authority? How does this relate to your writings, specifically the quote: “Sunday is our mark of authority… the church supersedes the Bible, and the shift from Sabbath to Sunday observance demonstrates this authority.” (Catholic Record of London, Ontario, September 1, 1923)?
The Catholic Record was an official Catholic publication, approved by several Canadian archbishops, which lends credibility to the claim that it could express such a view. However, the provocative nature of the statement (“the church is above the Bible”) aligns with polemical narratives used by groups opposing Catholic doctrine, suggesting possible exaggeration or selective emphasis.
Why can’t it be both– an inward apostasy AND an actual physical mark? Spiritual compromise messes our minds and leads us into all sorts of wrong choices. John wrote as he saw and heard. He did his best to describe the vision but didn’t speculate on its “deeper” meaning. Revelation is rich in symbolism, but where the literal makes perfect sense, that should hold.
Literal should not be ruled out. That’s correct. But that should not be our obsession and focus.
Many thanks to you, Dr Eli, for sharing your wisdom and Biblical understanding, again!. As in the garden, Satan appears to use confusion and misunderstanding to disrupt our obedience to GOD’s Law. From the very start, the serpent saw that man could be easily persuaded by deliberate misinterpretation of GOD’s Word. I pray that the Lord will continue to protect your ministry.
Rob (from Australia)
Thank you so much, Rob!
Makes sense what you say. The marks are not physical but spiritual. The Lord showed me this many years ago. Thank you. You may wish to see http://www.ThePathofTruth.com – Victor.
Thanks for your comment Victor. Blessings to your ministry.
Awesome!
Great explanation demystifying the truth in the scripture. This understanding have eluded many so called Bible teachers.
Thank you.
Those of us who discovered the truth have only Good Lord to thank for it.
Good to get the understanding of the Tefillin. According to Dr Derek Prince, the Mark of the Beast is literal! There will be just as Gods Word says, a Mark/Chip in the right hand, or the forehead. This Chip is already being used to pay for goods in, Sweden, being implanted in the hand.
Let’s be alert.
Dr Eli ! IThis is the best excellent. I appreciate your site and all that you do. It is my hope to enroll soon, meanwhile, I would very much like to get a copy of my book “Nazah: White Linen and the Blood of Sprinkling” to you. The subject has been IMO greatly misunderstood even maligned because most do NOT understand the Jewish connections. A check of reviews on Amazon will give you insight on it.
Thank you, Dr. Stevenson!
Thank you very much for this message, more Greece to your elbow.
I think you meant “more grease to your elbow” (I had to look it up!) 🙂
A new understanding of the text! Thank you!!
Blessings, Cynthia!
Thank you very much for the insight.
Juliet, you are welcome!
This is very interesting.
Food for thought.
This was very interesting reading. The more people read this the more they will realise that God is very near .
Yes, Marie. You are probably right!
futuristic divi!ces where ideas told to me, like chips
There is always some theory about what will become the physical mark of the beast. We should, of course, watch out for that too. But the mark of the beast does not need to be a literal/physical thing at all. Which means it is more dangerous.
Wow! Thank you for this amazing article on this subject.
Blessings, Lilia!
I am happy to read the books
Blessings to you, Pastor Paul!
Some Christian denominations, especially of the Seventh Day Adventist (SDA) persuasion, see the Roman Catholic Church as the little “horn” which in later years assumed the authority of the crumbling Roman Empire. By changing Saturday Sabbath to Sunday Sabbath, as assumed by the SDAs, the Catholic Church as an institution, not the individual members, has been identified as the “Beast” and the Sunday Sabbath as the “mark of the Beast”.Could you please express your views on this interpretation? Thanks and Shalom.
I take exception to this view. I don’t think it is helpful at all. Though I am no Catholic. 🙂
Thanks so much for your short but apt response to my inquiries.